Books and Special Issues of Journals



Screen-Philosophies of Violence
HJEAS (Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies)
Deadline for proposals: 8 February 2015

HJEAS (Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies) seeks papers for a special thematic block on "Screen-Philosophies of Violence". HJEAS is a peer-reviewed journal of the Institute of English and American Studies at the University of Debrecen, Hungary publishing critical articles, interviews, and book reviews in the fields of American, British and Irish literature, history, culture and cinema and is available from JSTOR and ProQuest.
Articles in the thematic block "Screen-philosophies of violence" may address individual films, auteur oeuvres, generic nodes of representation (in action films, thrillers, horror, western, war and political cinema) which pursue a critical attitude to violence, that is propose to consider -- in a systematic, questioning, argumentative, speculative or diagnostic manner -- the relationship between violence and reality, existence, values, knowledge, attitudes, etc. The editor of the block believes that cinematic violence, when not used as dramatic spectacle or assumed as a tendency of behaviour in the sole service of psychological realism, may advance our understanding of the notion of violence as representation (violence and mediation), epistemology (knowledge as violence/violent forms of knowledge), ontology (the violence of existence) and ethics (categories of valuation and violence). In addition, cinema is capable of exploring the frequently violent discursive logic and destructive nature of stereotypes relating to gender, sexuality, race, ethnicity and subcultures. Apart from topics raised within Film Studies and traditional branches of philosophy, contributions relying on relevant aspects of Cultural Studies, Gender Studies, Genre Studies, Postcolonial Studies, Trauma and Memory Studies are also sought.

HJEAS invites contributions exploring screen philosophies of violence with reference but not limited to the following topics:
- thinking violence through stylistic devices and film poetics: form as violence in films
- missing motivations, broken chronologies, fragmented stories: the violence of disnarrative feature cinema
- cinematic practices that question the humanist view of man and nature, individual and society
- films that unfold the logic of stereotypes, scapegoating, and normative values, or investigate the cultural grammar and ideological semiotics of violence
- cinema as a source of Other gazes and a vehicle of de(con)structing the pleasures of sexist and colonial spectatorship
- films exploring the causes of domestic/marital/adolescent violence, violence at school, the workplace and in deviant subcultures
- films analysing discourses and symbolic institutions of violence in stories set in hospitals, prisons, educational institutes and the military
- films offering an analytical approach to everyday forms of violence in closed societies, totalitarian states, religious or other sects
- filmmakers examining the underlying logic of historical, collective and personal traumas or the relationship between individual and structural violence
- raising general questions in connection with the poetics and politics of screen violence
- taxonomic overview of violence in cinema

HJEAS encourages article submissions from a variety of interdisciplinary perspectives and academic orientations. Publication decisions are based solely on the quality of the submissions, which undergo a double-blind review. For further information on our guidelines for manuscripts to be considered for publication, please see our website:
Texts should be submitted electronically using the following addresses:
- <gyori.zsolt@arts.unideb.hu>
- <hjeas@unideb.hu>
Deadline for proposals:8 February 2015
Notification of acceptance: 31 April 2015
Delivery of completed papers: 31 August 2015

Please forward any questions to:
Zsolt Győri, Assistant editor: <gyori.zsolt@arts.unideb.hu>
Institute of English and American Studies
University of Debrecen, Hungary
(posted 23 June 2014)



Focus on Twenty-First Century Studies
Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies (Vol. 26 Issue 2, September 2015)
Extended Deadline for Abstracts: February 22, 2015

The label "Twenty-First Century" has been gaining rapid currency in recent criticism. In particular the last couple of years have seen a number of publications, essay collections (e.g. Adisehshian and Hildyard 2013), monographs (e.g. Boxall 2013) or new journals (C21) which focus exclusively on the very contemporary. This special issue of Anglistik seeks to map this emerging critical territory and to sketch and interrogate what the "21st Century" potentially entails and indicates beyond mere temporality. Aware of the difficulties of defining critical parameters and categories for a century that is merely in its second decade, we want to gather articles around the question "What’s old, what’s new?" and invite contributions which address prevalent (dis)continuities with regard to texts, genre, and criticism, as well as the challenges of teaching, writing, and reading in the new millennium.
Articles should either aim for a wider theoretical perspective or comparative analysis of post-2000 texts, media, or art works. We welcome diachronic approaches detailing transitions from the 20th to the 21st century and seek to include further contributions on a variety of topics, including, but certainly not limited to the following:
- Contemporary fiction
- Globalization of literature
- Developments in contemporary drama and performance practices
- The changing face of the publishing industry
- Reading and teaching in the 21st century
- Language and communication
- Identity and/or memory
- Developments in genre
- Medial representations and narrations of terror
- (Post)Humanism
- New utopia/dystopia
Please send 250 word proposals (for 5000-7000 word articles) by 22 February 2015 to the focus editors:
- Julia Hoydis at <julia.hoydis @uni-koeln.de>
- and Chris Boge at <chrisboge@web.de>.
Contributors will be notified of acceptance by 1 March 2015.
Final articles should conform to MLA-format and are due 15 May 2015.

This special issue is will appear in September 2015. Abstracts will also be considered for publication in future issues of Anglistik by the general editors. Anglistik is a peer-reviewed academic journal, dedicated to publishing original research articles and reviews within the field of English studies. All queries regarding the journal should be send to <redaktion-anglistik@uni-koeln.de>.
(posted 23 January 2015)



Neo-Victorian Biofiction: Re-Imagining Nineteenth-Century Historical Subjects
A themed volume in Rodopi’s Neo-Victorian Series (2016)
Deadline for proposals: 28 February 2015

We invite contributions on Neo-Victorian Biofiction for a themed volume in Rodop's Neo-Victorian Series to be published in 2016. This edited collection will examine the manifold narrative ethics and strategies employed by writers, dramatists, poets, filmmakers, graphic novelists and other artists to re-imagine the lives of nineteenth-century historical subjects.  From celebrities, including iconic public figures and notorious criminals, to obscure individuals virtually erased from historical records, as in the case of slaves, servants, industrial and sex workers, the personal triumphs and traumas of real-life people of the period continue to exert an evident fascination for the present.
On one hand, neo-Victorian biofiction’s prosopopoeic 'resurrectionism' seeks to write/right the wrongs of history, to shed new light on the dark sides of the Victorian archive and, ultimately, to perform an ethics of truth and testimony. On the other hand, it involves ethical risks of appropriation for present-day agendas, symbolic (re-)victimisation, factual distortion, and even defamation.
How do 'biofictioneers' negotiate these risks so as to do justice and bear after-witness to the actual lives lived? To what extent do artists self-consciously foreground, question and reconsider the historiographic metafictional slippage between fact and fiction in their works? And is it legitimate to 'invent' compensatory or alternative histories? Indeed, can texts heavily reliant on fabulation still be regarded as biofiction per se? As well as proposals on the usual suspects, such as Queen Victorian and the great Victorian writers of Dickens, Wilde & Co., we are particularly interested in chapter proposals on biofictions of the following: artists and models; Australian Aborigines; children; doctors; indigenous actors in the India's 'First War of Independence'; maids and menservants; mistresses and prostitutes; poets and poets' muses; travelers and explorers.
Possible topics may include, but need not be limited to the following:
• biofiction's shaping role in contemporary views of 'the Victorian'
• the relationship between biofiction and postmodernism
• the politics of prosopopoeia (voice/voicing, single vs. multiple points of view, third-person  biofiction vs. first-person ‘autobiofiction’, etc.)
• techniques producing empathy and/or distancing effects
• the ideological (feminist, postcolonial, queer, etc.) agendas of biofiction
• the un/ethics of biofictional practice
• biofiction in the context of adaptation studies
• the gender politics of biofiction
• spectrality and/or biofictional ‘grave robbing’
• the ontological slippages between fact and fiction, history and story
• the uses of comedy in biofictional texts
• differences in biofiction across neo-Victorian genres and media
• biofiction as after-witness to nineteenth-century traumas
Please send 300-500 word proposals (for 8,000-10,000 word chapters) by 28 February 2015 to the series editors:
- Marie-Luise Kohlke at <m.l.kohlke@swansea.ac.uk>
- and Christian Gutleben at <Christian.GUTLEBEN@unice.fr>.
Please add a short biographical note in the body of your email.
Completed chapters will be due by 1 September 2015.
(posted 21 October 2014)



International Perspectives on Teaching the Four Skills in ELT
A volume in the International Perspectives in ELT series
Deadline for proposals: 28 February 2015

International Perspectives in ELT. Series Editors Sue Garton and Keith Richards. Palgrave MacMillan
International Perspectives on Teaching the Four Skills in ELT. Edited by Annie Burns and Joseph Siegel

Thank you very much for considering making a contribution to International Perspectives on Teaching the Four Skills in ELT. We hope that this short introduction will give you a sense of what the series sets out to achieve and help you to prepare a short chapter outline for inclusion in the full proposal that Anne and Joseph will develop. It comprises three short sections, the first two adapted from the ‘Advice to Authors’ that is sent to all contributors and the third an example of a chapter summary from a previous proposal. We very much hope that you will decide to contribute to this volume and look forward to reading your chapter.

Characteristics of the series and the volume
There is a strong emphasis in the series on balancing global and local perspectives.
• It is global in scope, with a variety of perspectives, providing an opportunity to compare and learn from experiences of researchers and teachers around the world.
• It has a strong and direct pedagogic/practical focus on one of the four skills (speaking, listening, reading, or writing) but will also link with cutting-edge research.
• It fits in with the current shift towards developing local pedagogies, which have global resonance.
• It will be used on teacher education programmes as a basis for reviewing current developments in the teaching of the four skills and comparing approaches and experiences in different educational contexts.
Your contribution should therefore have a strong local flavour, be globally relevant, have something distinctively fresh or original to say and be designed to stimulate debate. As this is a book in the International Perspectives series, our goal is to offer readers a range of insights from around the world on each of the four skills. We envision four sections in the book, one section dedicated to each skill, with four chapters in each section.
The emphasis in your chapter should be on the practical dimension (locally situated but with an eye on global relevance) of the skill you’ve chosen. However, the theoretical underpinnings of the chapter, while not foregrounded, should be clear.

Chapter outline
Your chapter will probably have an outline very similar to the following, though this advice should be regarded as indicative rather than prescriptive: 1. Explain the skill/pedagogy/teaching issue you are addressing and frame it in broad terms. Situate it in the field by referring to other (especially recent) work carried out in the area. Introduce relevant frameworks or concepts that help organise thinking around the issue.
2. Illustrate the issue with a local example (your own research or experience). Explain the context, participants, processes and outcomes, providing relevant illustrations, extracts from data, etc. If your example is a research study, please remember these chapters are not research reports. The focus is not on the nature of the research but on how it sheds light on the skill/issue examined, so keep descriptions of research methodology brief. This will probably mean a description of the context, participants and data collected, but not details about procedures or data analysis.
3. Explain what your example tells us about the skill/pedagogy/teaching issue, making sure you refer back to the way you framed the issue in the first section. Also include your own reflections on your research/teaching practice/context.
4. Make explicit how your local experience is relevant to a wider global audience. Include detailed implications and/or recommendations and/or practical advice to relevant groups (teachers/trainers/ materials developers etc.).
Chapters will be between 4-5000 words (including references (maximum of 15) and appendices).

Notes for submissions
Proposals should not exceed 300 words.
Please send your proposal as a Microsoft Word document to <fourskillselt@gmail.com>.
In the title of your submission, please indicate which skill your proposal focuses on. For example: Writing_Siegel (i.e., skill_last name).

Tentative workflow and timeline
Submission of abstracts: 28 Feb 2015 (sent to <fourskillselt@gmail.com>)
Decision on proposals: 31 March 2015
Full papers due: 30 Sept 2015
Final decisions (in consultation with peer reviewers): 30 Nov 2015
Book proposal submission to publisher (Anne and Joseph): 31 Jan 2016

Illustrative chapter summary from a previous proposal
‘Edgy’ activities as a means of challenging learner identity in the EFL classroom
Recent work has promoted the motivational benefits of learners being allowed to 'be themselves' or 'speak as themselves' in the EFL classroom. Yet it could also be argued that if learning is to be truly transformative, learners need to be guided towards other identities, which incorporate the competencies they are acquiring in the classroom. Indeed writers have talked about the need for teachers to 'destabilize' language learners' sense of self as a pre-condition to the development of English-mediated identities.
In this chapter I will report on classroom practices observed in an Indonesian junior high school. The English teacher used methods that did not conform either to conventional local practice or to the established tenets of 'communicative language teaching', but could clearly be seen to motivate his pupils in terms of their enthusiastic participation in class and positive attitudes towards learning the language outside of class. In particular the teacher deployed 'edgy' activities, so called because they force learners to the edge of their comfort zones. The chapter will describe some of these activities, and argue that they work -- as motivators and as effective L2 practice -- because they challenge the learners' current identities and encourage them to imagine other possible selves with new symbolic competencies. Although these lessons took place in provincial Indonesia, they have resonance for the many global contexts where English carries into adolescents’ worlds a wave of personal threats and opportunities.

Thank you again for your interest and contributions.
(posted 11 December 2014)



Crime Writing
A special issue of The Human (June 2015)
Deadline for completed essays: 1 March 2015

The Human (issn: 2147-9739) is an international and interdisciplinary indexed journal that publishes articles written in the fields of literatures in English (British, American, Irish, etc.), classical and modern Turkish literature, drama studies, and comparative literature (where the pieces bridge literature of a country with Turkish literature). To learn more about The Human: Journal of Literature and Culture and its principles, please see our manifesto on this page:
http://www.humanjournal.org/index.php/about-the-human-manifesto

The Human is now inviting submissions for a special issue to be published in June 2015. The special issue will be devoted to crime writing (fiction and non-fiction) in all of its diverse forms and multiplicity of cultural situations. The topic, for instance, may cover journalistic reportage, online fansites for aficionados of crime, detective fiction broadly construed, crime writing for children and young adults, hacking, true crime writing, historical crime writing, and other subjects. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are treatments that deal with global (non-Western) writing or that bridge East and West. Less-covered subjects are most welcome. Successful submissions will demonstrate rigor, originality and persuasive argumentation for the significance of the thesis. View further details on the journal’s website:
http://www.humanjournal.org/index.php/call-for-works

Completed essays of 4500-5500 words will be due no later than March 1, 2015, to guest editor, Rebecca Martin <rmartin@pace.edu>.
(posted 22 October 2014, updated 24 October 2014)



Finite, Singular, Exposed: New Perspectives on the Modernist Subject
Deadline for proposals: 2 March 2015

The editors of the volume Finite, Singular, Exposed: New Perspectives on the Modernist Subject are seeking for contributions to complete this ongoing book project. The editors are part of a research team currently involved in a project entitled "Individual and Community in Modernist Fiction in English". Our most recent publication as a team has been the volume Community in Twentieth-Century Fiction (Palgrave, 2013).

We are looking for papers offering new insights on the modernist subject. We welcome proposals for 6000 word essays in English on canonical modernist authors (Conrad, James, Joyce, Woolf, Ford, Lawrence, Mansfield, Stein…) as well as on non-canonical and late modernists. While we don't expect participants to adopt our own theoretical framework (Nancy, Blanchot, Agamben on individual and community), we are specially interested in theoretically informed approaches that offer innovative takes on the representation of the subject in modernist fiction. In the context of the recent wave of dialectico-metaphysical approaches to subjectivity and individuality encouraged by thinkers like Fredric Jameson, Slavoj Zizek, Jean-Luc Nancy and Alain Badiou, a fresh re-definition of the modernist individual is manifestly in order, a re-definition that is likely to enrich the field of "new Modernist studies". We thus propose a tentative return to the theoretical articulation of Modernist individuality. This return is not to be conceived as an antagonistic response to community-oriented approaches to modernist fiction, but rather as an attempt to complement it through a dialectical counterweight.

If you are interested in this project, please submit proposals of no more than 800 words and a short bio-bibliography to the editors:
<paula.martin@uco.es>
<gerardor@ugr.es>.
Deadline for submissions: March 2nd 2015.
Notification of acceptance: March 20th.
The authors selected will be asked to submit their complete 6,000 word-long essays by August 1st 2015.
(posted 29 January 2015)



The Quickening of the Senses: Translating for the Stage
Palimpsestes 29
Deadline for proposals: 15 March 2015

The call for proposals is available at http://www.essenglish.org/cfp/conf1504.html#stage
(posted 5 November 2014)



Explorations of Consciousness in Contemporary Fiction
A peer-reviewed edited volume
Deadline for proposals: 15 March 2015

Editors: Grzegorz Maziarczyk and Joanna Klara Teske
We invite proposal submissions for a forthcoming edited collection concerning the contemporary English-language novel (published c. 1975-2015) and the light that it sheds (or does not shed) on human consciousness.
In his essay "Consciousness and the Novel" (2002) David Lodge suggests that "literature is a record of human consciousness, the richest and most comprehensive we have” (10), more than that, it is “a kind of knowledge about consciousness which is complementary to scientific knowledge” (16). In the subsequent survey of novelistic techniques, Lodge tries to demonstrate that the novel is the form of art best suited to represent the human psyche. Being engaged in the defence of the self, Lodge is, however, wary of recent development in cognitive sciences and poststructuralist literary theory, both of which question this notion.
The above ideas of Lodge might provoke some controversy, not least because Lodge seems to take literature as a source of both empirical data and knowledge, whereas contemporary art operates more often as an invitation for the reader to broaden his/her life experience, test new ideas and question old assumptions, participate in mental experiments and the like. In other words, art might now serve first of all as a mode of cognition of the human mind and its products.

We welcome papers on topics which might include, but are not limited to:
- philosophy of mind and the novel,
- mental experiments in contemporary fiction,
- novel ideas in cognitive sciences (e.g. interpretations of Libet’s experiments on volitional acts) or natural sciences (e.g. Dawkins' idea of meme) and their impact on fiction,
- stream of consciousness and other verbal representations of human psychic experience,
- visual, multimodal and/or digital representation of consciousness in contemporary fiction,
- literary attempts to deconstruct, re-interpret as well as defend the traditional notion of the self,
- the themes of self-consciousness, self-cognition and self-creation in contemporary fiction,
- cultural diversity in representation and interpretation of consciousness,
- novelistic treatment of moral issues related to current research on consciousness (e.g. the selfish-gene hypothesis or the behavioural strategies related to the Prisoner’s Dilemma),
- the impact of the Internet and IT on the human psyche and its reflection in the novel,
- mental disorders and their fictional representations,
- novelistic (science fiction and cyberpunk included) speculations concerning the future of human consciousness.

Proposals (250-word abstracts) should be submitted to <grzegorz.maziarczyk@kul.pl> and <jteske@kul.pl> by March 15, 2015.
Notifications of acceptance will be sent by March 30, 2015.
Final papers will be expected by September 01, 2015.
We hope to be able to publish the collection by the end of 2015.
We would like to ask the authors to follow the MLA stylesheet (7th edition) and use British English spelling. Please attach a brief biographical note to the final text of your paper.
Grzegorz Maziarczyk, Associate Professor in Literary Theory
Joanna Klara Teske, Assistant Professor in British Literature
Institute of English Studies
The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
Al. Racławickie 14
20-950 Lublin
Poland
(posted 21 January 2015)



Justice and Compassion: Hume's Moral Philosophy and Contemporary Practical Ethics
A special issue of Diametros - An Online Journal of Philosophy
Deadline for sending papers: 31 March 2015

Diametros - An Online Journal of Philosophy welcomes papers on Hume and contemporary practical ethics until 31st March 2015.
The special issue, planned for publication in June 2015, is intended to continue a series of special issues dedicated to the applications of various classical ethical theories in contemporary practical contexts.
This time the journal’s focus is on Hume's moral theory, in particular on the two components which constitute its conceptual framework: justice and compassion. Authors are kindly requested to submit their proposals for double-blind peer review through the online platform of the journal. 
http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/pages/view/przesylanie#online
(posted 10 July 2014)



Interpreting in Conflict Situations and in Conflict Zones throughout History
Linguistica Antverpiensia NS
Deadline for proposals: 1 April 2015

Linguistica Antverpiensia NS: journal of the Department of Translators and Interpreters, Artwerp University
See https://lans-tts.uantwerpen.be/index.php/LANS-TTS
Guest editors: Lucía Ruiz Rosendo (University Pablo de Olavide) & Clementina Persaud (University Pablo de Olavide)

The figure of the interpreter as an intercultural and linguistic mediator in zones devastated by conflict has always existed due to the fact that conflicts have been intrinsic to the development of history. The distinctive trait of these interpreters is that, unlike other interpreters who are seldom in danger when exercising their profession, they risk being subjected to psychological and emotional pressure or physical harm and are often unable to find politically or linguistically neutral spaces, and the combatants do not recognise them either (Kahane 2008).
Although in some civilisations, such as the Babylon Empire (Kurz 1985), interpreters enjoyed great prestige, it was only in the second half of the twentieth century that interpreting was recognised as a profession with the creation and development of simultaneous interpreting during the Nuremberg trials and the subsequent establishment of the first interpreting schools. Since then, interpreting as a profession has achieved a high level of professionalisation and specialisation. However, language brokering in conflict zones has continued to be a non-regulated occupation mainly carried out by interpreters who have not undergone any formal training and lack the professional skills that are essential if they are to perform adequately as interpreters. Furthermore, there is a lack of recognition of the specialised role that conflict interpreters play.
Nevertheless, in the last few decades international associations have become more aware of the complexity of the role that interpreters play in conflict zones and of their vulnerability and need for special protection. As a consequence, some initiatives have been developed and the role of interpreters in conflict has attracted more attention in the literature on interpreting with works such as those by Balaban (2005), Carr (2007), Tipton (2008, 2011), Baker (2010), Inghilleri (2005, 2010), Inghilleri and Harding (2010), Greene (2013), Footitt and Kelly (2012), Footitt et al. (2012), Kelly and Baker (2012), among others.
In spite of the increasing awareness of the role of interpreters in conflict and the expanding literature on interpreting in conflict, we believe that few studies to date have dealt with the role of interpreters in conflict zones in different chapters and periods of history -- from prehistory to contemporary history -- and how their status has developed.
The main objective of his issue is therefore to focus on the role of interpreters in conflict zones and situations in different chapters and specific conflicts of history with the ultimate goal of shedding light on the particularities of each period or conflict in terms of working practices and procedures, policies and norms, ethics, status and profile, neutrality, identity and ideology, and/or to compare these aspects in different periods or conflicts.

We invite proposals dealing with one or more of the following topics:
What has been the role of interpreters in conflict zones and in conflict situations in certain episodes of history with a special view to working practices and procedures?
How could the interpreter working in conflict be described in terms of profile and status, neutrality, identity and ideology? Have these concepts changed throughout history?
What are the policies and norms that have regulated the role of conflict interpreters throughout history?
What are the ethics underlying the work of the conflict interpreter in specific periods of history?
What has been the role of the interpreter in recent conflicts?
What role have interpreters played in the different stages of conflicts (conflict settlement, conflict transformation and conflict resolution)?
What is the role of the interpreter in protracted conflicts? Has this role changed or developed in any way, or has it remained the same?
What are the present and future directions that research on this topic might take with regard to  current and future practices and training that might enhance the status of these interpreters?

Proposals: abstracts of approximately 500 words, including some relevant bibliography, should be submitted by 1st of April 2015.
Please send your proposals to Lucía Ruiz Rosendo <lruiros@upo.es>.
Acceptance of proposals: 1st of May 2015
Submission of articles: 1st of December 2016
Acceptance of articles: 30th of February  2016
Publication: November-December 2016
(posted 30 September 2014)



Language and Law
Alicante Journal of English Studies - Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses
Deadline for proposals: 15 April 2015

Editors:
Miguel Angel CAMPOS PARDILLOS, University of Alicante (Spain)
Shaeda ISANI (University Grenoble-Alpes (France)

First Deadline (abstract proposals): April 15th, 2015
Second Deadline (full papers): October 15th, 2015

Alicante Journal of English Studies (Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses) is an internationally distributed and well-indexed journal on English Studies published annually since 1988 by the University of Alicante (Spain). It is available both in paper and electronic formats.
Previous issues of the journal can be accessed at the Alicante Journal of English Studies at:

Alicante Journal of English Studies
is currently preparing a Special Issue on Language and Law to appear early 2016. It invites contributions on a variety of aspects of language related to the law: semantics, terminology, lexicology, lexicography, translation, teaching, critical discourse analysis, etymology, simplification, etc. Contributions should include language related to the English-speaking legal systems as one of the parameters of analysis, either as per se or in comparison with other legal cultures or language(s).
In addition to scholarly articles, proposals for book reviews of recent publications related to the field of law and language are also welcome.
Submissions will be submitted to a double-blind peer-reviewed panel.
Abstracts outlining problematization, methodology and corpus (approx. 400 words, not including bibliographical references) should be submitted before April 15th, 2015 to both co-editors simultaneously:
Miguel Angel CAMPOS PARDILLOS <ma.campos@ua.es>
Shaeda ISANI <shaeda.isani@u-grenoble3.fr>
Authors selected will be notified before 30th June 2015.
Full papers must be received before 15th October 2015 and must comply with the Journal guidelines:
(posted 31 January 2015)



The Canadian Alternative: Canadian Cartoonists, Comics, and Graphic Novels
A volume of essays
Deadline for completed papers: 30 April 2015

For a proposed edited and refereed volume on Canadian graphic novelists and cartoonists. Dominick Grace and Eric Hoffman, editors of Dave Sim: Conversations, Chester Brown: Conversations, and Seth: Conversations for the University Press of Mississippi, are editing a collection of essays provisionally titled The Canadian Alternative: Canadian Cartoonists, Comics, and Graphic Novels. We seek previously unpublished essays addressing Canadian cartoonists/comics. Our primary interest is in "alternative" cartoonists and cartooning, narrowly defined; that is, figures associated with the underground, independent, and/or ground-level comics movements. Figures of key interest might include but are not limited to:
Marc Bell
David Boswell
Chester Brown
David Collier
Julie Doucet
Rand Holmes
Jeff Lemire (especially his independent work)
Bernie Mireault
Bryan Lee O'Malley
Dave Sim
Seth

However, and as the inclusion of Lemire above indicates, we are also interested in papers dealing with the Canadian "alternative" more broadly-defined, whether represented by the visions of specific creators who have worked in mainstream comics (Byrne, Dan and Gene Day, Lemire, McFarland, etc.) or by Canadian alternatives to mainstream US comics publishing (e.g. the Canadian "whites" of World War Two), the various attempts to create a Canadian market/national hero (perhaps best represented by Richard Comely and Comely Comics's Captain Canuck), and other distinctly Canadian takes on the graphic medium (e.g. Martin Vaughan-James's The Cages, or BP Nicholls's use of comics/cartooning). Substantial essays (5,000-8,000 words) focusing on specific creators, comparing/contrasting the work of a few creators, or addressing Canadian movements in comics are welcome. Submit completed papers by April 30 2015 to Dominick Grace (dgrace2@uwo.ca) and/or Eric Hoffman (diamondjoecity@gmail.com). Inquiries/proposals are also welcome.
Though a publisher has yet to be determined, the University Press of Mississippi has expressed interest in publishing this collection.
(posted 9 September 2014)



Rethinking Hegemony and Domination in Translation
Special Issue of Target - International Journal of Translation Studies
Deadline for proposals: 30 April 2015

Guest edited by Stefan Baumgarten and Yan Ying (Bangor University, Wales, UK), and Jordi Cornellà-Detrell (Glasgow University)

Rationale
While there is no doubt that the 'ideological' and 'power turn' have reshaped the discipline of Translation Studies, much work still needs to be done in order to fully understand the ontological and epistemological underpinnings of the impact of ideology and power on the theory and practice of translation. The rapidly changing technological and corporate landscape in which translation theorists and practitioners find themselves immersed makes it necessary to keep exploring issues of power through sustained interdisciplinary engagement with other fields, such as the social sciences, critical philosophy or political science. Despite an increasing awareness of the impossibility of value-free research or practice, there appears to be a certain lack of self-reflection on our own entanglement within contemporary power structures. Structures which, in the apparent absence of an alternative to the current global capitalist orthodoxy, are largely driven by financial, economic and technological forces. With a view to opening a new debate on questions of hegemony and domination in relation to translation, this special issue aims to gather cutting-edge and cross-disciplinary research. By encouraging contributors to rethink the impact of power and ideology on the theory and practice of translation as well as on their own critical reflections, we welcome proposals dealing with contemporary political, sociocultural, (eco)linguistic, financial-economic and technological aspects of translation. The main aim of this special issue is to explore translation as a phenomenon caught in the conflicting forces of individual subjectivities, cross-cultural asymmetries, hegemonic values and the tensions between market-driven and customer-centric approaches.

Papers could focus on any of the following themes and aspects
Towards a (critical) theory of ideology and power relations in translation
- The legacy of the ‘cultural’ and ‘power’ turns
- New critical insights into the concepts of power and ideology and their relevance to translation theory
- Technoscience and posthumanism: a new turn in Translation Studies?
Power and ideology in the translation industry
- Ideological effects of technological change on translation theory and practice
- The social and ideological impact of translation technology
- Neoliberalism and technological rationalization
Politics, policy making and translation
- (Neo)imperialism after postcolonialism
- Symbolic violence, heteroglossia and (linguistic) imperialism
- Translation (technology) as a tool for activism and resistance

Deadlines
- submission of 1-2 page proposal by 30 April 2015
- notification of acceptance of proposals by 31 May 2015
- submission of completed papers by 31 January 2016
- submission of revised papers by 31 August 2016
- publication date: March 2017

Submission
Articles will be 6000-8000 words in length in English. Paper proposals of 400-500 words as well as the first completed and final versions of papers should be sent directly by email to all the guest editors.
Detailed guidelines for papers are available at: https://benjamins.com/#catalog/journals/target/guidelines

Contacts
All inquiries should be sent to all the guest editors:
- Stefan Baumgarten (s.baumgarten@bangor.ac.uk);
- Jordi Cornellà-Detrell (jordi.cornella@glasgow.ac.uk);
- Yan Ying (y.ying@bangor.ac.uk).
(posted 11 December 2014)



British autobiography in the 20th and 21st centuries
A book to be published in anglistik und englischunterricht (Winter Verlag Heidelberg)                                                                   

Deadline for proposals 30 April 2015

To be published in anglistik & englischunterricht (Winter Verlag Heidelberg)                                                                   

Autobiographies are among the bestselling books in Britain, as, for example, two out of the first ten from Waterstone's list of bestselling books are autobiographies (Dec. 2014). Other forms of autobiographical expression outside the traditional book format flourish as well. But while a number of publications dedicated to the study of American autobiography have recently come out, substantial collections of critical perspectives on twentieth and twenty-first century British autobiography have been rare. For such a volume, to be published in the series anglistik und englischunterricht in 2016, we invite both case studies and survey articles addressing a variety of texts and aspects, including but not limited to the following:
• Autobiography as a 'high' cultural (literary, artistic etc.), 'mid-brow' and 'low' cultural (popular, celebrity etc.) form in Britain
• Observations on genre developments and trends in British life writing; 'marginal' autobiographical forms
• Autobiographical expression in film, TV and the various new media such as blogs
• British archives of autobiographical statements, and their uses
• Autobiography, (British/European/colonial) history and memory
• Complexity and fluidity of constructions of identities (British, Welsh, gender, class, age etc.)
• Functions of paratextual elements
• The marketing of autobiographical texts
• The reception of autobiographical texts
• (Examples of) Uses of autobiography in the teaching of English language, culture and literature (considering both the production and interpretation of autobiographical texts in educational contexts)

Please send a proposal of 300 words to:
- Prof. Dr. Gabriele Linke, University of Rostock (gabriele.linke@uni-rostock.de)
- and Dr. Sarah Herbe, University of Salzburg (sarah.herbe@sbg.ac.at)
Deadline: 30 April 2015.
Final manuscripts will be due by 31 December 2015.
(posted 26 January 2015)



Images of minority languages and identities
Poli-femo (IULM University, Milan)
Deadline for proposals: 30 May 2015

The journal Poli-femo (IULM University, Milan)  announces the call for papers for its next thematic issue on "Images of minority languages and identities".
We welcome articles that focus on, but are not limited to, the following topics:
• Construction of minority identities through translation
• Interlingual and intercultural translation of images of minority identities and languages
• Translation strategies and images of language and identity minorities
• Linguistic and cultural translation of language and identity minorities
• Language and identity pluralism and literary rules
• Images of minority identity and languages in the media
• Language and identity minorities and the role of institutions
Other related topics proposed by those who wish to collaborate in the volume will be seriously evaluated by the Scientific Committee, in order to expand the exploration undertaken in the current issue of the Journal.

Submission Guidelines.
If you are interested in contributing please submit an abstract (min. 10/max. 20 lines) and a short Curriculum Vitae by May 30th, 2015 to:
<redazione.polifemo@iulm.it>
Authors will be notified by June 15th, 2015 and each accepted paper will have to be submitted (in either Italian, English or French) by September 1st, 2015. Every article submitted to the journal will be subject to a double blind peer review.
The special issue will be edited by Prof. Paolo Proietti and published in December 2015.
You can read the call for papers here.
(posted 23 January 2015)



The Discourse of Clothing
Meridian critic
Deadline for article submission: 1 June 2015

The first 2015 issue of the academic journal Meridian critic invites scholarly articles which analyse and interpret the discourses concerning clothing. Beyond its protective and/or ornamental purpose or its role of ensuring the wearer's decency, clothing may indicate belonging (to an age group, a gender category, a certain place, a social milieu, an ethnic community, a religion, a trend of opinion, etc.), a change in status, a provocation, etc. Clothing is not just a form of self-expression, but also a way of communication. It is difficult, however, to conceive of the constitution of a dress code as a system of signification outside the linguistic code. The contributors to Meridian critic are invited to reflect on the forms, functions, values, and the reception of the discourses on clothing, approached from a literary and/or linguistic perspective, with possible additional insights from ethnology, sociology, anthropology, psychology, aesthetics, etc.

Lines of interest such as the following (but not only) may be explored:
• The particularities of the discourse of clothing in various textual genres (literary, scientific, religious, journalistic, etc.)
• Ideologies and literary trends reflected in the discourses on clothing;
• From description to argumentation in the discourse of clothing;
• The cultural specificity of discourses on clothing; their reflection of language-culture interactions;
• The dynamics of discourses on specific items of clothing;
• The lexic of discourses on clothing;
• Denotation and connotation in the discourse of clothing;
• Clothing: from image to discourse;
• From clothes to costume and viceversa through the discourse of clothing

Deadline for article submission: 1 June 2015.
We welcome papers in English, French, German, and Romanian.
Please send the abstracts (ca 200 words), the full paper (up to 7000 words), as well as a brief biographical note (ca 400 words) to the following address: <simonamanolache@litere.usv.ro>.
For details regarding style, please visit the following page: http://meridiancritic.usv.ro/index.php?page=instructions-to-authors

We also welcome book-length studies in the field of literature and linguistics, published in 2014, to be reviewed in our journal.
Please send the books to the following address: Meridian critic, Facultatea de Litere şi Ştiinţe ale Comunicării, Universitatea „Ştefan cel Mare” Suceava, Str. Universităţii nr. 13, 720229 Suceava, Romania
(posted 2 February 2015)



Thomas Aquinas' Theory of Conscience and Contemporary Debates on Conscientious Objection
Diametros - An Online Journal of Philosophy
Deadline for papers: 15 June 2015

The Editor of Diametros - An Online Journal of Philosophy invites papers on Thomas Aquinas' theory of conscience until 15th June 2015.

In particular, articles are welcome that feature such aspects of the theory as its admission of the possibility of erroneous judgments of conscience and its relation to recent controversies concerning conscientious refusals by health care professionals to take part in certain ethically contested medical procedures ("conscience clauses"). Other aspects of Aquinas’ theory of conscience, which merit an in-depth discussion, can also be dealt with.

Authors interested to contribute to this edition of Diametros, planned for publication in September 2015, are kindly requested to submit their proposals for double-blind peer review through the online platform of the journal:
(posted 14 October 2014)



The conceptualisation of number in the English lexicon
Lexis, issue 10
Deadline for proposals: June 2015

The e-journal Lexis is planning to publish its 10th issue, devoted to ‘the conceptualisation of number in the English lexicon’, in 2016. Main editor: Laure Gardelle (ENS de Lyon). The full call for papers for issue 10 is available at http://lexis.univ-lyon3.fr/spip.php?rubrique30

Number, understood here in a narrow sense as the contrast between 'one' and 'more than one', spontaneously conjures up a grammatical category, which in English distinguishes between the singular and the plural. For several theoretical frameworks, the main meaning of the singular is to refer to one entity, and that of the plural to refer to more than one [Corbett 2000: 4]. This is illustrated, for example, by the pair magazine / magazines. In  this case the plural is a feature which is expressed in discourse in the form of an inflection added to a minimal lexical form, which brings its own contribution to the denotation, viz. the value 'more than one'.
The concepts of 'one' and 'more than one', however, cut across the grammatical categories of singular and plural. This is what the present issue wishes to explore, in order to describe how ‘one’ and ‘more than one’ are conceptualised in the lexicon. We welcome contributions on the following topics (the list is non-exhaustive):
- lexical plurals: for a number of plural-only nouns, or pluralia tantum, it is impossible to break down the meaning into lexical meaning + 'more than one'. For instance, measles does not mean one measle + one measle [and so on]; despite the grammatical plural, the word denotes a single disease. Acquaviva [2008: 79] concludes that the plural conceptualises the referent as 'non simplex', but that its semantic value for a given noun depends on the way in which the lexical contents of that noun define 'one'. It could be interesting to study in greater detail the relationship between the lexical contents of a noun and the semantic contribution of grammatical number. Acquaviva’s conclusion also calls for parallel studies of singular mass nouns (singularia tantum).
- collective nouns, aggregates and other nouns denoting internal plurality:  linguistic tradition isolates nouns such as family or crockery, which, even when they are grammatically singular, denote a plurality of elements. These nouns all present a double level of conceptualisation: a whole made up of multiple units. More recent studies, however, point out a variety of modes of conceptualisations among those nouns, which could be explored further. For instance, some collective nouns show more permeability than others, in the sense that their attributes are more easily inherited by the units which compose the whole. For example, a young pair implies young people, whereas a young organisation does not imply young members [Joosten et al. 2010]. Some collective nouns group the units together on the basis of spatial contiguity (e.g. pile), others on the basis of temporal contiguity (e.g. succession), and so on [Arigne 2006, 2011]. Papers on the metaphorical use of collective nouns (e.g. an army of business consultants) are also welcome. For instance, Flaux and Van de Velde [2010: 60] show that in French, such collective nouns in determinative uses convey a sense effect of quantity and that they are less sensitive to grammatical number, in the sense that un escadron d’élèves (lit. a squadron of pupils), for example, can denote the same number of pupils as des escadrons d’élèves (squadrons of pupils). The plural mainly has an emphatic role.
- more generally, the use of nouns followed by of will be of interest (e.g. a bit of): for instance, Huddleston and Pullum [2002: 349-350] show that deal requires a singular, uncountable noun to its right (a great deal of work, vs. *a great deal of errors), whereas for some speakers, amount or quantity now license a plural to their right. It could be interesting to study the conceptualisation operated by those nouns in relation to the notions of 'one' and 'more than one'.
- the relationship between grammatical number and massification or abstraction: some nouns denoting aggregates have a massifying effect (e.g. the French noun valetaille), or an abstracting effect in the case of hyperonyms -- such as jewellery, which Wierzbicka [1988] terms a 'collective supercategory'. Similar effects might also occur in discourse, with noun phrases such as all that succession and repetition of massed humanity. Another case is that of morphological plurals, which do not guarantee that the entity denoted by the noun can be counted (e.g. *he counted the furnishings, [Acquaviva 2008: 87]). In this sense, the conceptualisation conveyed by such a noun is the result of a process of abstraction.
- some nouns are morphologically invariable, either systematically so (e.g. sheep) or only in contexts of hunting or conservation (e.g. elephant) ([Allan 1976], [Corbett 2000]). It could be interesting to study the relationship between the lack of plural morphology and the conceptualisation of the animal, taking the variety of cases into account -- Allan shows that some nouns are more likely than others to have no final -s in these contexts (e.g. hyena vs. teal).
- the place of prefixes in the conceptualisation of number: for instance, Richet [2005] shows that one language might consider an element as 'more than one', via a multiplying prefix (e.g. quadruple croche in French), while another will make it a fraction of 'one' (e.g. hemidemisemiquaver). This phenomenon again calls for further study of the factors at play in the conceptualisation of a unit.
- recategorisation effects: the way an element is perceived might lead to a change in the grammatical behaviour of the corresponding noun. This is the case for instance with 'unit plurals' [Corbett 2000], such as coffees vs. (some) coffee, for which sensitivity to grammatical number is a consequence of the change in the conceptualisation of the entity. It could be interesting to study the limits of this correspondence, in standard language as well as in creative uses.

References
Acquaviva, Paolo. Lexical Plurals: A Morphosyntactic Approach. Coll. Theoretical Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2008.
Allan, Keith. Collectivizing. Archivum Linguisticum 7, 1976: 99-117.
Arigne, Viviane. Les discrets collectifs face aux massifs: des modes de discrétisation du massif (version longue). In Jean-Claude Souesme (dir.), Le qualitatif, Cycnos 23:1, 2006. <http://revel.unice.fr/ >
Arigne, Viviane. La figure du tout intégré et les noms discrets collectifs. Anglophonia 30, 2011: 59-99.
Corbett, Greville G. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000.
Flaux, Nelly & Danièle Van de Velde. Les noms en français: esquisse de classement. Paris: Ophrys, 2000.
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002.
Joosten, Frank et al. Dutch Collective Nouns and Conceptual Profiling. Linguistics 45:1, 2007: 85-132.
<http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/144837/1/Joosten,_De_Sutter,_Drieghe_et_al._(2007).pdf>
Richet, Bertrand. Des chiffres et des lettres : expression(s) du nombre en anglais contemporain. Cercles, 2005.
< http://www.cercles.com/occasional/ops2-2005/richet.pdf>
Wierzbicka, Anna. The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1988.

Manuscripts may be written in French or in English, and should be accompanied by an abstract of up to 10 lines in French and in English, as well as a list of the relevant key words. They should be sent to the Editor of Lexis <lexis@univ-lyon3.fr> as email attachments (Word and pdf), and will be refereed by two members of the international evaluation committee. Manuscripts may be rejected, accepted subject to revision, or accepted as such. There is no limit to the number of pages.
Abstracts and articles will be sent via email to <lexis@univ-lyon3.fr>.

Important dates:
• January 2015: call for papers
• June 2015: deadline for sending in abstracts to lexis
• September 2015: Evaluation Committee’s decisions notified to authors
• November 2015: deadline for sending in papers
• November-December 2015: proofreading of papers by the Evaluation committee
• January-February 2016: authors’ corrections
• March 2016: deadline for sending in final versions of papers.
(posted 29 January 2015)



"Based upon a Life": The Biopic Genre in Question
LISA e-journal
Deadline for proposals: 1 July 2015

While George F. Custen defines a biopic (biographical film) as a depiction of "the life of a historical person, past or present" (Bio/Pics, How Hollywood Constructed Public History, 1992, p. 5), he also considers the impact of celebrities and stars as "key historical figures" whose public persona may interfere with the genre’s historical discourse. More recently, Ellen Cheshire has asked if this "maligned and misunderstood genre" is, in reality, a genre of its own (Bio-Pics: A Life in Pictures, 2015, p. 3). Biopics have indeed sparked off a number of on-going debates, not merely due to their claims of veracity, but through their practice of gender politics, intertextuality, reflexivity, and their hagiographic roots capable of impacting the narrative modes, visual and discursive strategies perpetuated by contemporary "life stories" on screen.
In this issue of Revue LISA/LISA e-journal (http://lisa.revues.org/), we invite contributors to explore the various mechanisms, conventions and patterns underlying the construction of “exceptional destinies” on screen (cinema/television). Not only should we question the type of person chosen as subject for biopic portrayals, but we also aim to prompt reflection on the ideological discourse conveyed by the genre. Whether they relate the lives of men and women embroiled in politics (Alice Paul, Malcolm X, Rosa Parks, John F. Kennedy, etc.), or, as in the subcategory of artist biopics, those of emblematic creators (Ernest Hemingway, Truman Capote, Georgia O’Keeffe, Charles Pollock, Allen Ginsberg, Sylvia Plath, etc.), biopics seem to promote an image of society that highlights the achievements of exemplary individuals -- be they politically engaged or artistically acclaimed. Moreover, although relying on authentic sources (biographies, autobiographical accounts, historical narratives, documentaries, newspaper articles, etc.), biopics are often decried as a popular genre that constantly blurs the boundary between public and personal history, History- and storytelling.
We call for papers that examine the ongoing mutations of this problematic film genre which Tom Brown and Belén Vidal qualify as “troublesome” in The Biopic in Contemporary Film Culture (2014). While the genre provides a number of filmic portrayals of heads of state and other well-known political figures, some biopics actually challenge historical facts by drawing attention on minority figures whose struggle for identity and political rights receives a positive treatment (Iron Jawed Angels, Harvey Milk, Sally Hemings: An American Scandal, 12 Years a Slave, etc.). Despite its tendency to set up ideals, the biopic does not seem to freeze History, but digs into the flaws of existing portraits and texts, exploring the problematic relationship between the viewed object and the looking subject.

Some possible avenues of research may include:
- The impact of the biographed characters over the chosen narrative structures and filming strategies (Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, John Reed, JFK, Richard Nixon, J. Edgar Hoover, George W. Bush, Henry VIII, Mary Queen of Scots, Queen Victoria, Charles Darwin, Florence Nightingale, Lawrence Of Arabia, Elizabeth I, Elizabeth II, Henry V, etc.)
- Biopic codes and conventions and the world of business and industry (Preston Tucker, Jimmy Hoffa, Howard Hughes, Steve Jobs, Jordan Belfort, etc.)
- Writers (William Shakespeare, Jane Austen, C. S. Lewis, Iris Murdoch, Virginia Woolf, Fitzgerald), artists and stars representing the world of music and showbiz (Billie Holiday, Woody Guthrie, Bob Dylan, Loretta Lynn, Johnny Cash, Ray Charles, Tina Turner, James Brown, John Lennon, Louis Valdez, etc.) and cinema (Oscar Micheaux, Charles Chaplin, Alfred Hitchcock, Howard Hughes, Marilyn Monroe, Ed Wood, etc.)
- The singular careers of sportsmen (Jake Lamotta, Babe Ruth, Muhammed Ali, Mike Tyson, Jim Brown, Chariots of Fire, etc.) and of killers raised to fame thanks to the media (Al Capone, John Dillinger, Bugsy Siegel, etc.).
- Repetition and variation, canonization and subversion within the biopic treatments of historical truth.
- Hybridization of the biopic genre (for instance) with animation films (Superstar: The Karen Carpenter Story, 1989); the blending of the historical with the fantastic (Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter, 2012).
- Biographical films and censorship.
- The role of biopics in promoting public debates on social issues, especially regarding questions of gender, race and class.
- The biopic canon in the era of mass entertainment and commercial imperatives: epic quests or post-mortem tributes of a new kind?
- The relationship between biopic and star/celebrity studies.

Proposals not exceeding 500 words and including a short biographical notice should be addressed by July 1, 2015 to:
- Delphine Letort (Delphine.Letort@univ-lemans.fr)
- and Taïna Tuhkunen (Taina.Tuhkunen@univ-angers.fr).
Completed essays will be due November 15, 2015.
(posted 27 February 2015)



Debating the Afropolitan
An issue of volume 21 of EJES
Deadline for proposals: 31 October 2015

The editors of EJES are issuing calls for papers for the three issues of the journal to be published in 2017. Potential contributors are reminded that EJES operates in a two-stage review process, the first based on detailed proposals (up to 1,000 words), and the second on full essays. The deadline for proposals for this volume is 31 October 2015, with delivery of completed essays by 31 March 2016.

Guest editors:  Emilia María Durán-Almarza (Oviedo), Carla Rodríguez González (Oviedo), Ananya J. Kabir (King’s College London).

In her 'Bye-Bye, Babar (Or: What is an Afropolitan?)' (2005), Taiye Selasi introduced the term 'Afropolitan' as a coinage that aims at capturing the embodied experiences of a younger generation of African diasporic subjects living in contemporary world cities. Since then, the term has been claimed by many who have identified themselves with the realities Selasi depicts in her essay, while it has also been challenged by others for its alleged class, racial, and ethnic bias, and even by its purported complicity with cultural commodification processes. In the light of these debates, the issue will explore Afropolitanism as a framework for the analysis of contemporary phenomena affecting those subjects and subjectivities that emerge at the intersections of African and urban materialities. It will do this by examining a variety of cultural, linguistic and literary expressions of Afropolitan populations of the post-1960s generations in European contexts. We seek contributions that analyse the complex interactions of race, ethnicity, gender, class, or age in the formation of contemporary Afro-diasporic subjectivities, as well as their intersections with spatial/material issues. Topics might include but are not limited to:
• Configurations of Afro-diasporic materialities in contemporary cultural representations
• Challenges and alternatives to ‘Afropolitanism’: theories, politics, identities
• Socio-economic, cultural and emotional networks in the (re)production of Afro-diasporic identities and identifications
• Intersections of gender, post-/ de-colonial and urban/spatial studies
• Afropolitan performances: drama, rhythms, visualities, discourses and styles
• Literary, linguistic and performative (re)creations of Afro-diasporic materialities
• The Afropolitan as a ‘cosmopolitan’ figure: challenges and potential
Detailed proposals (up to 1,000 words) for essays of no more than 7,500 words, as well as all inquiries regarding this issue, should be sent to all three editors:
More information about EJES.
(posted 27 January 2015)



Feminist Interventions in Intermedial Studies
An issue of volume 21 of EJES
Deadline for proposals: 31 October 2015

The editors of EJES are issuing calls for papers for the three issues of the journal to be published in 2017. Potential contributors are reminded that EJES operates in a two-stage review process, the first based on detailed proposals (up to 1,000 words), and the second on full essays. The deadline for proposals for this volume is 31 October 2015, with delivery of completed essays by 31 March 2016.

Guest editors:  Anna Kérchy (Szeged) and Catriona McAra (Leeds College of Art)

This issue seeks to explore intermedial interactions between literary and visual representations of the female body. Disrupting the contours of discipline and medium, the feminist project has radicalised text/image relationships in myriad ways, working with both contemporary examples and re-readings of the past. In the tradition of empowering marginalised other(ed) perspectives, Feminist Interventions in Intermedial Studies will seek to promote new methodological approaches that, going beyond the simple context of hegemonic domination, perform an interdisciplinary union of semiotics and corporeal feminism, of literary theory and readings in visual arts, and of iconography and revisionary interpretations of literature. Papers might, for example, explore how the semioticisation of female bodies affects the somatisation of texts and images; or offer a gender-sensitive analysis of topics like the role of illustrations, pictures collaged inside literary texts, the figurativeness of lyrical language, or the rhetorics of visual culture. We particularly welcome essays that deal with intermedial body politics in connection with the critique or negotiation of Englishness or of ideas and representations of Europe within Anglophone cultures and contexts.
Topics might include but are not limited to:
• Feminist practices, aesthetics and collectives
• Artists/writers who use literature/art in gendered ways
• Body Art/body politics
• Corporeal narratology/Corpusemiotics
• Feminist treatments of intermedial theory
• Gender-conscious narrative/poetical reinterpretations of ekphrasis, hypotyposis, synesthesia, iconotext, paratext, etc.
• The embodied reader/spectator and feminine subjectivity
• Feminist embodiments of analogue/electronic transmissions of knowledge
Detailed proposals (up to 1,000 words) for essays of no more than 7,500 words, as well as all inquiries regarding this issue, should be sent to both editors:
More information about EJES.
(posted 27 January 2015)



Getting and Spending
An issue of volume 21 of EJES
Deadline for proposals: 31 October 2015

The editors of EJES are issuing calls for papers for the three issues of the journal to be published in 2017. Potential contributors are reminded that EJES operates in a two-stage review process, the first based on detailed proposals (up to 1,000 words), and the second on full essays. The deadline for proposals for this volume is 31 October 2015, with delivery of completed essays by 31 March 2016.

Guest editors: Silvana Colella (Macerata), Brecht de Groote (Leuven), Frederik Van Dam Leuven)

Building on the achievements of the New Economic Criticism, literary critics have continued to expand our understanding of the many points of contact and separation between literature and economics. The present issue aims to push this established scholarship into new directions. It seeks to explore new approaches and methodologies and thus to shed light on some of the many connections between literary texts and, to use William Wordsworth's words, 'Getting and Spending'. While contributions are sought on literary and cultural texts from any historical period, the editors particularly welcome proposals that deal with the New Economic Criticism in European contexts.
Topics might include but are not limited to:
• The literary representation of economic concepts
• The translation, adaptation and retranslation of economic texts and motifs
• The image of the economist, industrialist or speculator in literature
• The image of the poet or artist in political economy
• Representations of 'economic women'
• Competing economic ideologies and their literary treatment: mercantilism, capitalism, socialism
• The rhetoric and poetics of economics: metaphor, anthropomorphism, ambiguity
• The ethics and aesthetics of economics: sympathy, trust, moral sentiments, consumption, desire
• Stereotypes in economic representation: intersections with nationalism, racism, anti-Semitism
• Literary responses to economic events
• Literary patronage
• The literary text as a commodity
Detailed proposals (up to 1,000 words) for essays of no more than 7,500 words, as well as all inquiries regarding this issue, should be sent to all three editors:
More information about EJES.
(posted 27 January 2015)


Permanently Valid Calls for Papers



The Journal of Cultural Mediation

The Journal of Cultural Mediation of the SSML Fondazione Villaggio dei Ragazzi "don Salvatore d'Angelo" focuses on the role of culture in perceiving and translating reality. The aim of this Journal is to promote research in communication, especially by investigating language, languages, cultural models, mediation and interculturality, welcoming contributions focussing on cultural mediation in modern society.
In particular manuscripts should concern:
- The role of the cultural mediator
- Linguistic/cultural mediation teaching methodologies
- Cultural mediation and identity
- Linguistic mediation in specialized discourse
- Analysis of text translations
- Quality interpreting - Interpreting as cultural mediation
- Professionalization and professional issues of interpreters
- Interdisciplinarity within Interpreting Studies
- Teaching methodologies in interpreter training
- Research on any aspect of interpreting in any research paradigm (including cognitive science, psycholinguistics, neurolinguistics, sociolinguistics, applied linguistics, discourse analysis, pragmatics, anthropology, semiotics, comparative cultural studies, cross-cultural communication, etc.)

All papers submitted to The Journal of Cultural Mediation should be original, neither having been previously published nor being considered elsewhere at the time of submission.
Papers can be written in Italian, English, French, Spanish or German, they should not exceed 6000 words and should be preceded by an abstract of 200-250 words. If the language of the paper is not English, please include a translation of the abstract in English as well. At the head of your abstract please indicate the title of the proposal, the name of the author/s, affiliation and email address. Please include five to six keywords.
The editor will select contributions for each issue and notify authors of acceptance or otherwise according to the dates below.
Authors wishing to contribute to the Journal of Cultural Mediation are welcome to submit their abstracts as email attachments to:
 <jcm.ssmlmaddaloni@yahoo.it>

For further information, contributors are encouraged to read the guidelines of the journal, given on our website:
IMPORTANT DATES (Issue 1)
March 31st: call for abstracts
April 15th: notification of acceptance
June 15th: paper submission
IMPORTANT DATES (Issue 2)
September 30th: call for abstracts
October 15th: notification of acceptance
December 15th: paper submission
(posted 16 February 2012)



The Brontës and the Idea of Influence
A thematic dossier in the “Writers, writings” section of LISA e-journal

In March 2007, Stevie Davies, Patricia Duncker and Michele Roberts gathered around Patsy Stoneman at Haworth in Yorkshire to talk about the influence that the Brontës had had on their evolutions as authors, and more generally, about the source of inspiration that the most famous family of writers in England could represent. Patsy Stoneman had already tackled the topic by publishing a book entitled The Brontë Influence in 2004 with the help of Charmian Knight. The issue of LISA e-journal "Re-Writing Jane Eyre: Jane Eyre, Past and Present" is further evidence of Charlotte Brontë's influence on the writers of the following decades or centuries. So far, these studies have been quite limited and this field of research, "the Brontë influence", offers a wide range of possible developments.
Moreover, if the four authors' poetry and novels have already been the object of numerous studies, there is much left to write about the influences which were exerted on the Brontës, whether religious, literary, philosophical or cultural. Taking account of the context of  a work is often a good way of understanding the issues underlying a text: the path taken by the Brontës, their journeys, their stays abroad, the books they read, etc. could prove to be very enlightening. Besides these external factors, one could also consider the interactions between the three sisters, who wrote in the same room and who read passages from their works aloud.
A final aspect to identify and study could be the influences which are exerted within the Brontës' works themselves. How can one account for the progress of the heroes and heroines? How is the influence that characters have on one another expressed? What role does nature play in the destiny of characters? Which other elements intervene in the novels?

This dossier devoted to the Brontës intends to analyse the works through the perspective of influence and three different fields of research can thus be considered:
-    influences on the Brontës
-    the idea of influence in the Brontës’ works
-    the Brontë influence on the writers of the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries.
Please send your proposals (one A4 page maximum) to Dr. Élise Ouvrard <ouvrard_elise@hotmail.com>.
Accepted articles will be published in the thematic dossier "The Brontës and the Idea of Influence" on the website of LISA e-journal:
(posted 10 January 2008, updated 3 November 2010)



Controversy: Literary Studies and Ethics
JLT-Journal of Literary Theory online

Submissions are continuously accepted.
Are literary scholars and critics supposed to voice their view on normative questions within their academic writings? How far should world views, political opinions and evaluations enter into the scholarly and critical work with literary texts? Is it even possible to exclude such judgements from literary studies? How and why do different traditions of literary studies treat these problems divergently?

Submissions are expected to refer to previous contributions to this controversy by Peter J. Rabinowitz and Marshall W. Gregory, which can be found here:
and here:
Please contact the editorial office for further details at
<jlt@phil.uni-goettingen.de>.
(posted 10 February 2011)